Your CV is lying about you (it’s designed to)
On the format that hides exactly what’s most useful about you — and what to do instead.
Your CV isn’t underselling you by accident. It’s doing its job.
At some point in my mid-twenties I sent a CV to a job I genuinely wanted. Two pages, properly formatted, and it contained almost no useful information about me. It had my degree, my titles in reverse chronological order, and a skills section with words like “cross-functional collaboration” that could have sat on any CV in any industry. It accurately described the jobs I’d had. It said nothing about the person who’d had them. I didn’t get the job — and I’ve thought about that document ever since, not with regret but with a kind of fascinated irritation at the format.
This isn’t a failure of self-presentation
It’s what CVs are for. The format was designed in an era when careers were linear and the relevant information was simple: where have you been, and for how long. That maps neatly to a chronological list. It still works extremely well if your career is a clean climb up one ladder in one industry. For anyone whose path looks like anything else — multi-disciplinary, interrupted, lateral, industry-jumping — the format actively works against you. Not because you lack things to show, but because the things you have don’t fit the available fields.
A sequence vs a pattern
A CV can only carry a sequence — titles and dates in order.
But your real value is a pattern — the throughline that runs underneath the sequence. And a sequence that was actually a pattern looks, from the outside, like a series of disconnected moves.
The three things a CV can’t hold
Across several versions of my own working life, I keep finding the same three:
1. Translation. When I moved from chemistry research into web development, I brought precision under ambiguity, the ability to hold many variables at once, and the tolerance to run an experiment that returns a null result and read it as data, not failure. The CV said “BSc (Advanced Chemistry), 2015” and listed dev roles as if the science were just context, rather than the foundation of how I approached every problem since.
2. Pattern. Most nonlinear careers have a coherent internal logic — mine was a steady move toward the intersection of systems thinking and communication. A CV can’t carry a pattern. It can only carry a list.
3. Judgement. Knowing which meeting to push back in, when the brief is asking the wrong question, how to read a room or a dataset. Judgement has no field on the form. It lives in the gap between the bullet points.
The document that tells the truth
I’m not saying abolish CVs — they’re a filtering mechanism and filters exist for a reason. But there’s a cost to letting the format become the way you understand your own history: you start to see your career through its limitations, and the gaps and pivots start to look like the story rather than the thread running through them. What’s helped me, and the people I’ve talked to about this, is keeping a second document alongside the CV. Not a replacement — a translation document.
What did I actually learn here?
What capability did I build that has no official name?
What did I carry forward that never showed up in a job description?
I wrote my own about eighteen months ago, in the gap between my last corporate role and the first time I had to describe myself to a client as a freelancer. It was the first time I’d looked at my history as something other than a series of justifications for my current position — and I found things in it I’d been carrying for a decade without noticing. Your CV is lying about you. Not maliciously — it just wasn’t built to tell the truth about work that can’t be reduced to a title and a date range. The good news is you can tell it yourself. You just have to do it in a different format.
— Katie
What’s the capability you’ve built that has no official name — the thing you do that never shows up on a CV but has been the most consistently useful thing about you?
Reply and tell me, I read every one.
More from Multiple Lives Theory:
→ the multi-passionate person’s guide to answering “what do you do” — on describing a life that doesn’t fit one title
→ what happens to your identity when you remove the job title — on who you are without the shorthand
New here?
Multiple Lives Theory is a weekly essay on nonlinear careers, reinvention and the emotional reality of changing your life. Sundays and Thursdays.





Katie,
Your article on the CV and the hidden translation document resonated deeply — not just as a reflection on careers, but as a reflection on how we reduce ourselves to fit systems that were never designed for us.
"A CV can only carry a sequence. But your real value is a pattern."
This line stayed with me. It applies not only to careers but to everything we try to document: our identities, our legacies, our testimonies. In a world dominated by algorithms, we are constantly asked to fit ourselves into predefined fields — and what gets left out is precisely what matters most.
I call this the Digital Testament — a collection of testimonies from those who refuse to be silent. Not because they have answers, but because they have patterns that can't be captured in a box.
Your "translation document" is a form of Digital Testament. It is a proof that you tried to leave a trace that goes beyond the chronological list.
Thank you for the reminder that the most useful things about us often have no official name. And that it is our job to name them anyway.
— The Modern Lens
Agreed. CVs are so misleading. I understand how they came to be, but we've leaved to far into the CV without considering how to understand the wider person (this is true of both the person writing their CV and the other side of the table reading it). Love the push back on the over-burdened CV.